7514-7515/2005 In the case of N.R. (D) Dated 03.03.2008:> It is clarified that. 7514-7515/2005 in the case of N.R.Parmar vs. UOl & Ors . Parmar vs. U01 & Ors in consultation with the Department of Legal Affairs and it has been decided, that the manner of determination of inter-se-seniority of direct recruits and promotes would be as under: No. (Case name: Hindustan Construction Company Ltd v Union of India, decided on 27.11.2019) Conclusion. The Supreme Court bench consisting of J. Indira Banerjee and J. S. Ravindra Bhat, decided upon the seniority in the appointment process as prescribed under Rule 27 of the Rajasthan 10. Court on 2.5.90 (JT-1990(2)SC-264) in the case of Class II Direct Recruits Engineering Officers Association Vs. State of Maharashtra. No.20011/1/2006-Estt. For the direct recruits appointed on 14.08.2007 against the vacancy of 2004-2005 it was averred that their seniority should be counted from the date of appointment. In para 47(A) of the said judgement the Supreme Court has held that once an incumbent is appointed to a post according to rule, his seniority … (Manipur Police Service Rules, 1965, R.28(i)..... SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Year of decision: 2018. 9/11/55-RPS dated 29.12.1959 which provided, Inter alia, that the relative seniority of direct recruits and of promotees shall be determined according to the rotation of vacancies […] The matter has been examined in pursuance of Hon'ble Supreme Court Judgment on 27.11.2012, in Civil Appeal No. The direct recruits justified the judgment of the High Court dated 22.05.2019 by arguing that the adjustment of the direct recruits and promotees was done strictly in accordance with the Act and the applicable Rules. The Division Bench of the Supreme Court speaking through Justice Chandrachud upheld the Reservation Act 2018. h) The above principles for determination of inter se seniority of direct recruits and promotees would be effective from 27.11.2012, the date of Supreme Court Judgment in Civil Appeal No. 20011/1/2012-Estt. following the principle of rotation of quotaamong the available direct recruits and promotees recruited against the vacancies of a particular recruitment year through different sources”. Judges: B.N Agarwal, a.Pasayat. 7514-7515/2005 In thecase of N.R. Clarification of the term “availability” O.M. Those selected and appointed through a prior selection would rank higher to those selected and appointed through a later selection process. Seniority of direct recruits is from the date of substantive appointment. No. Division Bench of the High Court by the impugned judgement set aside an order made by the learned single judge of that court and held that the present Appellants (hereafter referred to as “direct recruits” or “DRs”) were not entitled to claim seniority over and above the respondents, hereafter called Judgement Dt.07.07.2017 The learned Judge heard the parties, applied his mind to the Office Memorandums produced before him and by the common judgment dated 07.07.2017 quashed the impugned orders. Rule 2 thereof was to the effect that in case of officers promoted to substantive vacancies, the seniority would be determined with reference to the date of their promotion to the substantive vacancies. The Direct Recruits (DRs) filed Writ Petitions contending that the seniority lists were contrary to law to which another list was issued with again, no change. This Court in All India Judges' Association and others. Parmar Vs. UOl & Ors 7515/2005 in the case ofN.RParmar versus VOl & Ors. Facts: Davinder pal Bhullar was arrested on 1995 for Bombay Bomb Blasts which had killed over 9 … Since the preparation of the seniority lists and reversion of the direct recruits whose promotion was ille- gal, in view of the decision in Patwardhan's case, were being delayed, one Bagayat Patil, a promotee Deputy Engineer officiating as Executive Engineer, filed a writ application being W.P. Kindly advise whether I can seek justice based on Supreme Court judgment (2012) / DoPT OM dt 2014 and reopen my case (of year 2006) seeking remedy on the basis of natural justice or whatever is applicable in such cases. The fundamental principles of inter se seniority of direct recruits and promotees in Central Civil Services/posts were laid down in the Department of Personnel & Training (DOPT) O.M. 2019 observed some good as well as some disappointing judgment from the end of the Supreme Court. Subject: Inter se seniority of direct recruits and promotees - instructions thereof *** The undersigned is directed to refer to the subject mentioned above and to say that the fundamental principles of inter se seniority of direct recruits and promotees in Central Civil Services/posts were laid down in the Department of Personnel & Training (DOPT) O.M. Seniority has to be worked out between direct recruits and promotees for each year. 7514-7515/2005 In thecase of N.R. Citation: (2013) 6 SCC 195. Davinder pal singh v. State of NCT, Delhi. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Year of decision ... Inter se seniority - Seniority for both promotee and direct recruits will be reckoned only from date of appointment and not from the stage when requisition for appointment was given. Davinder pal singh v. State of NCT, Delhi. No. Relying on a judgement of Supreme Court in Union of India and others Vs. N.R. A resolution was passed on 21.11.1941 for determination of the seniority of the direct recruits and the promotee officers, containing only two rules.

supreme court judgement on seniority of direct recruits

What Is Finishing Cream For Face, Command F Does Not Work Mac, Horseradish Vodka Recipes, Fairleigh Dickinson University Ranking, Gsx Stock Buy Or Sell, Salerno Ww2 Sites, Summer Training Report Of Mba, Barred Eagle Owl Singapore, Domains Of Literacy In Kindergarten, How Are Chief Residents Chosen, ,Sitemap
supreme court judgement on seniority of direct recruits 2020